When people talk about AI, they focus on the intelligence of the models—the mind-blowing outputs, the speed of response, the uncanny ability to generate human-like text. But what nobody talks about is the infrastructure nightmare behind the scenes.
Training AI isn’t just about having a great algorithm. It’s about having the right hardware, the right data, and a system that won’t collapse under its own weight. Every model that reaches the public has gone through an absurdly complex training process, filled with compute limitations, networking bottlenecks, energy demands, and a logistical maze that only a handful of companies can navigate.
Let’s pull back the curtain on what really goes into training AI—and why so few companies can even attempt it.
The first thing people underestimate is how much raw compute power is required to train a large AI model. You can’t just throw some data at an algorithm and wait. We’re talking about:
Early AI researchers didn’t have access to this kind of hardware. Before 2012, almost all AI training was done on CPUs. Then, when AlexNet came along, Geoffrey Hinton’s team realized that training their model on CPUs would take months—which made it completely impractical.
That’s when Hinton met Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA. Hinton explained the problem, and NVIDIA’s engineers helped rework the AI training process to run on GPUs instead. The result? Training time was cut down from months to days.
This was a turning point for AI. Without GPUs, large-scale deep learning would never have taken off. But even today, GPU availability remains a major bottleneck.
Compute power alone isn’t enough. You need to feed the beast—and that’s where data becomes a huge problem.
This is why companies like OpenAI and Google spend just as much time optimizing their data pipelines as they do on the models themselves. Training isn’t just about having data—it’s about getting it to the GPUs efficiently.
Another thing nobody talks about? AI training is an energy hog.
When you hear that training a model like GPT-4 took trillions of tokens, that translates to enormous energy consumption. AI data centers now require:
This is why training AI models is so expensive. Even if you have the GPUs and the data, you still need an infrastructure that won’t buckle under the load.
Even if you solve the compute, data, and energy problems, you’re still not done. The entire AI training process is fragile, and even small failures can cost millions.
Training an AI model isn’t like programming a typical piece of software. It’s a highly delicate, large-scale experiment.
And once the model is trained? The real work begins.
This is why only a handful of companies dominate AI: the infrastructure barrier is just too high.
Most startups and small companies simply can’t afford to train their own models from scratch. This is why so many rely on APIs from OpenAI, Google, and other AI giants instead of training their own models.
The infrastructure problem isn’t going away—but some companies are working on ways to make AI training more accessible.
Right now, training AI is a privilege of the few. But if the industry can find ways to solve the infrastructure problem, we might finally see a world where smaller companies can compete on AI—without needing billions in funding.
The next time you hear someone talk about AI, remember: the hard part isn’t just building a smart model—it’s making sure the infrastructure doesn’t collapse while training it.
AI isn’t just about intelligence. It’s about compute, energy, networking, and logistics. And until we solve those challenges, the AI revolution will remain in the hands of a few major players.
Commenting Rules: Being critical is fine, if you are being rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for your input.
Join a growing community. Every Friday I share the most recent insights from what I have been up to, directly to your inbox.