AI training isn’t a one-size-fits-all process. Depending on what you’re trying to achieve—whether it’s building a powerful base model, adapting AI to a specific use case, or making fine-tuning more efficient—you have different strategies at your disposal: pre-training, fine-tuning, and LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation).
But which one should you use? The answer depends on your goals, resources, and technical constraints. Let’s break it down.
Pre-training is the first and most resource-intensive phase of AI training. This is where a model learns everything it possibly can from massive amounts of raw data—usually scraped from the internet, books, academic papers, and code repositories.
Unless you’re OpenAI, Google, or Meta, you’re probably not doing pre-training yourself. Training a model from scratch is so expensive and complex that most companies use pre-trained models as a starting point instead of reinventing the wheel.
If you’re an enterprise looking to build your own LLM from the ground up, pre-training is essential—but for most use cases, fine-tuning is the more practical approach.
Once a base model has been pre-trained, it can be fine-tuned for specific tasks or domains. This is where you take a general-purpose model and adapt it to make it more useful for a certain audience.
Fine-tuning is the go-to strategy when you need an AI model that behaves in a highly specific way. Some examples:
Fine-tuning helps models become more useful in specialized domains, but it can still be expensive and slow—which is where LoRA comes in.
LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) is a relatively new technique that makes fine-tuning faster, cheaper, and more flexible. Instead of modifying the entire model, LoRA adds a small set of trainable parameters on top of the existing model.
LoRA is ideal when:
For example, if a manufacturing company wants an AI that understands complex turbine designs, they wouldn’t retrain a model from scratch—they’d use LoRA to inject the necessary domain knowledge without the massive costs of full fine-tuning.
Strategy | Best For | Cost & Compute Requirements |
---|---|---|
Pre-training | Creating a new AI model from scratch | Very high (Only feasible for AI giants) |
Fine-tuning | Customizing an existing AI model for a specific task or industry | Moderate to high |
LoRA | Efficiently adapting an AI model with minimal compute costs | Low to moderate |
Most companies won’t be pre-training AI models—that’s a billionaire’s game. But fine-tuning and LoRA offer powerful ways to adapt AI models to specialized tasks without breaking the bank.
If you need deep customization, fine-tuning is your best bet. But if you want a flexible, cost-effective solution, LoRA is a game-changer.
Either way, choosing the right training strategy is all about balancing cost, complexity, and performance. And as AI evolves, expect even more efficient ways to customize models without needing a supercomputer.
Commenting Rules: Being critical is fine, if you are being rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for your input.
Join a growing community. Every Friday I share the most recent insights from what I have been up to, directly to your inbox.