AI research has advanced rapidly, but one thing hasn’t changed: training a model is still incredibly difficult and expensive. The cost of compute, the complexity of infrastructure, and the inefficiencies in scaling large models have made AI training something only the biggest players can afford.
That’s what Excalsius is trying to fix. The team behind this project isn’t just building another AI tool—they’re creating a platform that aims to make model training accessible, scalable, and cost-efficient. But as they’ve discovered, building an AI training platform is one of the hardest challenges in the industry.
People outside the AI field often think training a model is as simple as writing some code and pressing “run.” The reality is far messier.
Excalsius is built around solving these exact problems—automating infrastructure, optimizing compute usage, and making sure AI teams spend less time worrying about hardware and more time focusing on their models.
One of the biggest ideas behind Excalsius is turning AI compute into a utility—like electricity. Right now, if an AI lab wants to train a model, they have to:
Excalsius wants to eliminate that manual work. Instead of AI teams managing everything themselves, the platform would:
If Excalsius succeeds, training an AI model would become as simple as plugging into a compute network and paying for usage—without the need for deep infrastructure knowledge.
While Excalsius has a bold vision, executing it isn’t easy. The team has identified several major roadblocks in making this system work at scale.
Right now, AI compute is spread across multiple ecosystems:
Bringing all of these together into a unified AI training platform is an enormous challenge.
Excalsius is attempting to bridge these gaps, giving AI teams seamless access to multiple compute sources without being locked into a single provider.
Cloud pricing isn’t static. One day an H100 GPU might cost $0.40 per hour; the next day, it’s $1.50.
For large AI labs, this volatility can lead to massive cost overruns. Excalsius aims to solve this by:
By dynamically adjusting where and how models are trained, Excalsius could cut AI training costs significantly.
Today, AI engineers spend as much time configuring infrastructure as they do building models. Excalsius wants to change that by offering:
This level of automation would save researchers and AI teams enormous amounts of time, allowing them to focus on innovation rather than infrastructure management.
Right now, only companies with massive budgets can afford to train custom AI models. If Excalsius succeeds, that could change:
Excalsius represents a potential shift in how AI training is done, moving away from centralized, expensive cloud contracts toward a dynamic, open compute network.
Building an AI training platform like Excalsius isn’t just about making AI easier to train—it’s about reshaping the entire AI infrastructure landscape.
If the team can pull it off, AI research could become far more open and competitive, reducing reliance on hyperscalers and making high-performance AI accessible to everyone.
The real question is: Can Excalsius truly democratize AI training? If they succeed, the AI industry will never be the same.
Commenting Rules: Being critical is fine, if you are being rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for your input.
Join a growing community. Every Friday I share the most recent insights from what I have been up to, directly to your inbox.