Ever tried building something genuinely meaningful with AI, only to realize it’s not as simple as typing a few lines of code and pressing enter? Turns out, “AI for good” isn’t just about good intentions or nifty gadgets but wrestling with a mountain of practical, ethical, and financial challenges. The technology part might be dazzling, but the real story lies in navigating the maze of funding, data access, privacy rules, and sheer human coordination. Here’s what I’ve learned diving deep into the trenches.
AI for good is often glorified as this magic wand that will save the world, from climate change to healthcare crises. The truth is, it’s much messier. The ambitious promise that AI can fight hunger, clean oceans, or improve medical outcomes clashes hard with reality: these projects usually have no straightforward business model. There’s no “sell this app and rake in millions” scenario; the impact is massive, but the cash flow is almost non-existent. That leaves AI for good projects in the awkward spot of hunting for pennies to solve problems that could be game changers if they had proper backing.
One project that drilled this home for me is the use of satellite images to spot marine litter, plastic garbage floating around in oceans, which is a massive ecological nightmare. On the surface, it sounds like a simple image segmentation problem, tell the AI to say whether a pixel is garbage or not, then bingo, problem solved. Except it’s not. The sheer scale of the world’s oceans, shifting currents, and the unpredictable nature of waste distribution make this a constantly moving target. Plus, nobody really knows exactly how much garbage is out there or precisely where. This makes organizing cleanup efforts like aiming at a shifting target in the dark.
The clever twist is that monitoring plastic garbage can also reveal ocean currents, which are vital inputs for climate models. Traditionally, measuring these currents required floating objects or ships to physically track flows, which is expensive and nowhere near scalable. By harnessing AI and satellite data, it’s possible to track the movement of trash and reverse-engineer ocean current behavior in real time. So, a project aimed primarily at cleaning oceans suddenly provides crucial climate data too. That’s the kind of impact AI for good projects can pull off, if they actually get the resources to develop and maintain their solutions.
Speaking of resources, funding is where the wheels typically come off the wagon. Unlike your usual tech startup with a VC lined up, AI for good projects often lean on volunteers. Many of these projects rely on highly skilled AI specialists donating their time, juggling their day jobs with mission-driven work on the side. Without a profitable business model, outside investors aren’t exactly swarming to offer cash. Public funding exists but tends to be project-based, short-term, and filled with red tape that doesn’t fit the nature of scalable tech platforms.
A sustainable model being explored involves having the paid core team “moonlight” as consultants for regular corporate gigs about half their time. This way, their commercial work funds the AI for good projects running the rest of the time. It’s an elegant way to keep the lights on without sacrificing the mission, but it’s not exactly the fairy tale of non-profit glory one might imagine.
Then there’s the data. You would think that open data should make AI for good easier. Spoiler: it’s rarely that simple. Even datasets labeled “open” often come with serious restrictions, many are only accessible to medical researchers or certain institutions, making genuine open access a fantasy. Data used to train AI models is expensive and painstakingly labeled, meaning that many worthy projects struggle to find the necessary fuel to train and test their AI. This issue is amplified when trying to serve developing countries, which desperately need solutions but face both infrastructure and data scarcity.
Once you finally get your hands on some data, there’s another beast to wrestle, data privacy rules, especially the GDPR. Europe’s gold standard on data protection, it’s a critical shield, but one that sometimes feels like wielding a sledgehammer to crack a nut when applied globally. In developing countries, where people might literally be dying for medical help, insisting on European-style data privacy protocols can sound absurd or, worse, obstruct life-saving work.
For example, in some African hospitals, X-ray images must have patient names written directly on them for workflow reasons. But privacy laws require removing identifying data before using such images for AI training. Trying to convince local partners why you can’t just have the data they have, and then spending hours on legalese so everyone can breathe a little easier, is one of those nonsensical but necessary tasks that drain time and energy. The worst part? The folks handling data never intend to misuse it; it’s just the system requiring hoops to jump through that don’t always make sense across contexts.
This all loops back to a bigger challenge with AI regulations. The new wave of AI rules, including the EU’s AI Act, aims to protect users and align AI development with ethical standards. That’s great on paper, but these regulations are often designed without involving enough people who actually develop and use AI day in and day out. This disconnect can lead to overly broad or vague rules that stifle innovation or prevent critical applications in vulnerable regions. It’s tempting to think every AI tool has the same risk profile, but lumping a complex medical diagnosis system with a simple “chat bot” built from a database of documents isn’t just naïve, it’s counterproductive.
If I had to sum up the secret sauce for successful AI for good projects, it boils down to purpose and pragmatism. Purpose attracts the right people and keeps the momentum alive even when funding is scarce and hurdles are high. But purpose alone isn’t enough, you need a flexible, scalable approach. That means building sustainable infrastructure, not just chasing short-lived grant money or launching one-off projects that fizzle out when the volunteers burn out.
I’ve come to believe that AI for good is less about some shiny new algorithm and more about the human ecosystem around it, volunteers who know their stuff, sensible regulations that recognize context, real data access, and smart funding strategies. As much as the tech excites me, it’s these practical challenges that decide whether the smartest AI will change lives or just gather dust on a GitHub repo.
The tech is here. We have the people. Now we need to fix funding, data access, and regulation so the impact isn’t just a concept but a reality that reaches beyond boardrooms and conference halls to the people who actually need it most. Otherwise, we’re just fiddling while the ocean fills with plastic and hospitals go under-resourced, with some shiny AI promises left dangling in the wind.
Commenting Rules: Being critical is fine, if you are being rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for your input.
Join a growing community. Every Friday I share the most recent insights from what I have been up to, directly to your inbox.
